Personal Blog

What is rich, now? - Not so Much Fun with Numbers

Posted by K Krasnow Waterman on Fri, Dec 05, 2008 @ 23:12 PM

A year ago, I wrote a blog about wealth in the United States.  In light of the current economic crisis, I thought I'd revisit the topic.  I couldn't find hard numbers out this quickly, so this is just some extrapolating done with what I could find. 


Last year, 10% of households earned more than $100,000.  I haven't been able to find anything that says what percentage of this year's layoffs are affecting these higher income earners.  But, the ABA Journal articles I'm reading seem to indicate that lawyers are only about 1 in 10 of the layoffs in big law firms.  If that layoff ratio is the same in other industries, it's likely that the number of households earning more than $100,000 probably still falls between 9 and 10 percent. 


Last year, the top 9% of households had $1 million in net worth, not counting their houses.  So, the fact that their houses are worth about 20% less this year probably doesn't keep them out of the top.   And, even though about 8,000 houses worth $1million or more were in foreclosure by September, that's still a drop in the bucket, less than 1/10 of 1% of wealthy households.


Where the wealthy are most likely seeing the economic slump is in their savings.  These folks, with more than $1 million, were an average age of 58 last year.  If they're following popular asset allocation strategies, that means they had between 25% and 40% in forms of saving that haven't diminished this year.  But, that also means they had between 60% and 75% of their savings in investments that have lost lots of value.  If they were conservatively invested in the Dow (down 36%  - 8635 today divided by 14445 a year ago) or an S&P 500 fund (down about 42%), they've lost anywhere between$216,000 (36% of $600,000) and $315,000 (42% of $750,000).  Neither the traditional strategies nor most people I've ever met are that conservative, so it's likely that they've lost a bit more.  So, I'm guessing that the top 9% are no longer holding assets (excluding houses) worth over $1 million, but rather have something over $725,000.


The losses of the wealthy may seem pretty irrelevant to everyone else, but these losses may impact others.  A year ago, it was considered reasonable to achieve 10% return on investments.  That means these households could have had $100,000 in income from their savings beyond what they might be earning or receive from social security (nearly half were retired).  With investments losing capital value and producing minimal income, many people will choose not to take any money out of investment accounts, in the hopes of regaining their former value.  That means that this 9% of the population won't be putting $8,000 a month each into the economy.  That's a lot less goods and services being purchased, and unfortunately a lot more layoffs rippling through the economy.   

Article has 0 CommentsClick here to read/write comments

Topics: net worth in US, earnings in US, savings in US

Fun with Numbers - What is Rich?

Posted by K Krasnow Waterman on Fri, Nov 09, 2007 @ 14:11 PM

On Tuesday, the Washington Post reported that many households that earn more than $200,000 don't think they're rich even though they earn more than 97% of families. So, who is rich?


50% of households in the US earned less than $48,201 in 2006

That income is not evenly distributed around the US. It's easier to feel rich in Mississippi, where you're earning more than half the population if you earn over $34.343. It takes $66,752 in New Jersey.

10% of households in the US earned more than $100,000 in 2005

In terms of dollars, it turns out that this top 10% earned almost 50% of all the earnings in the country. With 114 million households in the US in 2005, this means that about 1 million households have 50% of the earnings while 113 million households split the other 50%.

1% of households in the US earned more than $348,000 in 2005

The average income of the top 1% was $1.1 million.

The top 10th of 1% earned an average of $5.6 million.



The Federal Reserve reports on net worth every 3 years, so these numbers are from 2004. Net worth is the total value of assets (what you have in savings, real estate, business equity, etc.) minus liabilities (what you owe).

$93,100 was the mid-point for net worth in the US; half of households had more, half had less.

The bottom 25% had an average $13,300.

The top 10% had an average $831,600.

It's important to know that age matters a lot in this case. Younger people have saved less, people just before retirement have the most, and oldest folks have progressively less as they spend savings during their retirement years.

CNN reported that 8.9 million households (7.8% of households, or 1 in 13) had at least $1 million in net worth not counting the value of their primary home. These folks actually average $2.2 million in net worth. Who are they? They're in their late 50's, almost half are retired, and about one-fifth of them own all or part of a business.

So, if one in every two households has almost $100,000 and one in every ten households has nearly $1 million, what does the top 1% have? A recent survey revealed that about 1 million households now have more than $5 Million in net worth excluding their 1st home. Now, that's rich!


Article has 1 CommentClick here to read/write comments

Topics: net worth in US, earnings in US, savings in US