COMMENTS
I called my doctor's nurse today, as I was very concerned after reading all the posts about the side affects from this vaccine. In response to my concern, she pointed out that if people were going to have an allergic reaction, it would happen a few minutes after the shot was given. When I told her I didn't think that the reactions I heard about were *allergic* and that people were developing alarming symptoms days (or even weeks or months) after their shot, she blew me off and said that the medical community would only accept that information if it came from the CDC. Has anyone contacted the CDC about this?
Also, when I was given an official sheet of "side affects", it only included these symptoms: soreness at the injection site, swelling, and mild to moderate fever. I quote: "HPV vaccine does not appear to cause any serious side affects."
Not only is that very misleading, but I think that the current focus is only on allergic reactions. What these girls and their parents are describing does not sound like an allergic reaction to me.
My daughter suffered from a Guillain-Barre reaction to her third HPV shot. She was severely handicapped for several months and is only now regaining full strength 6 months later.
The article Polysorbate 80 and Histidine, a marriage of disaster, by Cynthia Janak, at
www.whale.to/vaccine/janak.html explains a very little known but researched very well arguement on why these Gardasil adverse reactions happen. This vaccine also contains sodium borate, whcih is essentially borax, why is that in there, I can find no reason! Polysorbate 80 has caused accelerated reproductive growth in neonatal rats and infertility. Research that by a general net search, you will find it, sorry I dont have copy of it in front of me. I have read a personal account of a mother wondering why her daughters were having accelerated development after the Gardasil vaccine. Does the govt. and the CDC have the right to do this? How do they sleep at night.
Lowell, You asked the million dollar question. "Does the government and the CDC have the right to do this?" It is my opinion, NO, but with all that I have found they are allowing it anyway. One of the things that I am researching is the possible involvement of the UN/WHO and their sustainability goals in regards to human capital = population. They have it pretty hidden and there is a lot of documents to go through. It is my opinion that it is possible that on one hand they are trying to eradicate cervical cancer (mainly for third world countries) for women who do not have access to clinics, etc. and the flip side is that for over 15 years they have been discussing sustainability of this world as to health care, resources, housing, etc. Is it all related, maybe. The only way to know that is if you are a member of the UN Population sustainability counsel, committee, or whatever they call it now.
In my opinion in what I have experianced in this world so far, there are two opposing powers. One is loving and good, the other is hating of all good that our creator provided us with, and wants to destroy all of it. Why I dont know, but my guess is its to destroy all within the opposing force. We this go on almost every day, the battle of good and evil. Gardasil is a good example of this. On one hand we have all the lies and distorted truth aimed at the most innocent and trusting amoung us, which are the tools of this destruction. Add to it the blinding existance of many that wont think outside the box, or for themselves, ya the sheep following the sheep. In this case its the Merck, the FDA, as well as other world controlling organizations. Whats the source of that, you guessed it. We have to have free will, otherwise or life is dictated to us. Maybe only when humans on this planet meet their final destruction of all, and everyone sees the truth for what it is, can God have this creation back.